Selected work · Independent consulting

Adapting the process to the problem.

Across consulting engagements, the industries and interfaces changed. The recurring work was to make the operating problem explicit, translate it into a usable structure, and document the result clearly enough for approval and production.

01 · A repeatable approach

The method stayed recognizable. The emphasis changed.

A workforce tool demanded careful exception handling. A sales presentation needed memorable screens and clear transitions. A consumer app emphasized choice and navigation. An ecommerce site required product discovery and detailed page behavior.

01

Frame the work

Clarify actors, goals, constraints, and the operational problem behind the requested interface.

02

Model the behavior

Use stories, cases, sketches, and flows to expose decisions, branches, and exceptions.

03

Shape the interface

Move from whiteboard and wireframe to the level of visual detail the team actually needs.

04

Make it buildable

Document screens, transitions, links, rules, and annotations so decisions survive handoff.

Business inputs
RequirementsUser storiesUse cases
Design artifacts
Whiteboard sketchesFunctional flowsWireframesPrototypes
Production support
AnnotationsScreen inventoriesTransition documentation

02 · Selected engagements

Four problems. Four different centers of gravity.

This is an overview of the consulting period rather than one artificially enlarged case study. Each project contributes a different piece of evidence about the work.

User stories, whiteboard sketches, and workflow development for a time-tracking application Mobile wireframes for the time-tracking application
Multi-role operations

Time-tracking application

Employees tracked location and time, managers assigned and reassigned work, and supervisors reviewed performance. The design also accounted for early departures, delays, assignment transfers, roles, and skills.

Hundreds of use casesException handlingRole-based workflow
Site map and functional specification for a medical touchscreen presentation Wireframe-to-final progression for a medical sales presentation
Guided presentation

Medical sales application

Because trained staff presented the material, the central problem was not self-service simplicity. Key sales points, transitions, and screen distinctiveness mattered more—and every interface, transition, and link was documented for production.

Wireframe to finalDistinct screen identityProduction specification
Annotated mobile screens for the Wake Up Motivated application
Consumer mobile UX

Wake Up Motivated

The customer-facing experience organized choices among speakers and topics, carrying the path from alarm and setup through selection and playback.

Mobile flowSpeaker selectionTopic selection
Annotated ecommerce wireframes for the LouSyl lifestyle brand
Ecommerce architecture

LouSyl

A lifestyle storefront for thousands of fashion and accessory products required product discovery, category behavior, detailed page states, and annotations that connected the interface to its rules.

User storiesFunctional flowsAnnotated wireframes
Consistency came from the reasoning—not from forcing every engagement into the same deliverable.

The consulting work used a shared discipline: understand the business situation, choose the right level of representation, and leave behind artifacts another team could act on.

What the work left behind

A portfolio of decisions and handoffs.

The strongest evidence from the consulting period is the range of artifacts and the way each one answers a different question.

Next in the chronological path: B&H—where the same ability to bridge operations, UX, and implementation was applied at enterprise scale.